Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Apr 6, 2016 in Haaretz | 0 comments

What Do U.S. Jews Need to Do to Support Religious Freedom in Israel?

The Western Wall agreement is collapsing, and it is time for Reform and Conservative Jews and all those who care about religious freedom and gender equality in Israel to go back to the barricades.

Charlie Kalech suffered injuries to his head after delivering a Torah scroll from the men’s section of the Western Wall to the Women of the Wall group, April 20, 2015.

(Photo by Miriam Alster)

Public pressure in Israel and America – demonstrations, press coverage, arrests and civil disobedience, public meetings at synagogues, petitions, protests to Israeli diplomats – is what made the agreement possible. And only public pressure will save the agreement now.

That’s my take at least.

I am supportive of that, but going to the High Court could take months or years to resolve an issue that, in theory at least, has already been resolved.

Natan Sharansky, in an interview with Haaretz, has assured world Jewry that Prime Minister Netanyahu sincerely wants an amicable resolution of the matter. Perhaps. But the issue is not what he wants but what he is prepared to fight for. And long

He has done it on issues of conversion and marriage, and infamously, on the drafting of yeshiva students. In the 2013 election, he favored a military draft of ultra-Orthodox young men, and in the 2015 election, he opposed it. In fact,

We see this too in how he deals with the Western Wall. For nearly a quarter of a century, when the Women of the Wall were not making headlines, he looked the other way. But when the women’s struggle for a place at the Wall became a regular story in the New York Times and generated real anger among American Jews, Netanyahu took action. He summoned American Jewish leaders to Jerusalem, involved Natan Sharansky in the negotiations, gave a rousing speech to Federation leaders on the need for a compromise, and assigned top staffers to find a solution. And to the credit of all, the Prime Minister included, they did.

The agreement was not an unalloyed victory for the Reform and Conservative movements. It left control of the Women’s Section of the Wall in the main plaza in the hands of the Orthodox authorities. The non-Orthodox movements were given the right to gather for egalitarian prayer at the southern tip of the Wall —a right they had already enjoyed for almost two decades. But the non-Orthodox representatives astutely negotiated a share in the governance of the egalitarian area, a concession that was widely interpreted, and correctly so, as conferring a new measure of government recognition on Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel. When Orthodox political and religious leaders, who had originally accepted the arrangements, understood this, they howled in protest, retracted their consent, and demanded a return to the status quo. And the ultra-Orthodox parties threatened to leave the government if the agreement was permitted to stand.

This was a moment of truth for Bibi Netanyahu. After all, a deal had been reached after exhaustive negotiations, and the agreement of both sides had been secured. And the Reform and Conservative movements could not accept any reduction of their role in the Wall’s governance. It was modest to begin with and justified all of the difficult compromises they had to make.

But he didn’t, despite his explicit promise to world Jewry to make the Kotel a “source of unity” for Jews everywhere. Instead, Bibi appointed his bureau chief, David Sharan, to come up with terms to satisfy the ultra-Orthodox. Sharansky has now said that Netanyahu should be given the time that he has requested “to bridge the disagreement.” But

They, and not the ultra-Orthodox, will pay the price; after all, the whole purpose of Sharan’s mission is to keep the ultra-Orthodox happy.

And what is the lesson for Reform and Conservative Judaism and proponents of religious liberty in the Jewish state? That for Bibi Netanyahu, when it comes to the religious rights of non-Orthodox Jews, a deal is not a deal and a promise is not a promise. That soaring rhetoric and extravagant assurances mean nothing. That if this deal can be summarily set aside, then no deal, ever, is worth the paper it is written on.

And most of all: That Bibi responds to pressure, and to pressure alone. It was pressure from Women of the Wall, with Reform and Conservative backing, that put the Kotel on Bibi’s agenda. It was pressure from the ultra-Orthodox parties that got the Kotel removed from Bibi’s agenda.

Will this happen? It is not clear. American Jews are immersed in their own elections and caught up in the bizarre campaign for president.

On the other hand, frustration at the appalling behavior of Israel’s religious leaders has reached a boiling point among American Jews. Hardly a week passes without a religious member of Israel’s government unleashing a torrent of verbal abuse at non-Orthodox Judaism — words that Jerry Silverman of JFNA has called “invective” and that Jonathan Greenblatt of ADL has characterized as “public expressions of hate.”

American Jews want a Western Wall that is open to all and governed in partnership with the great religious movements of Jewish life. If we don’t fight for it now, and instead permit Israel’s leaders to renege yet again on solemn commitments, the opportunity will be lost for a generation.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Like It? Share it!